Kimberly-Clark price to book ratio KMB
Market value divided by the book value of the company's net assets, since 2009.
- Today, Oct 23, 2026
- 20.9×
- 10-year median
- 64.8×
- Against its 10-year history
- 6th
- percentile: 0 is its lowest day, 100 its highest
- 10-year range
- 17.7× to 199×
- Peer median
- 5.7×
Kimberly-Clark's price to book ratio is 20.9× as of Oct 23, 2026.
That is below its ten-year median of 64.8×, lower than on 94% of days in the last ten years.
Over that time it ranged from 17.7× in May 2026 to 199× in Aug 2020.
The median for 8 household and personal products stocks of a similar size is 5.7×.
Price to book ratio over time
The dashed line is the 10-year median and the shaded band the middle half of its days.
Year by year
| Year | End of year | Low | High |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 so far | 20.9× | 17.7× | 26.0× |
| 2025 | 25.2× | 25.1× | 57.2× |
| 2024 | 34.2× | 34.1× | 61.7× |
| 2023 | 60.4× | 58.1× | 107× |
| 2022 | 105× | 58.2× | 107× |
| 2021 | 102× | 69.4× | 134× |
| 2020 | 137× | 135× | 199× |
| 2019 | n/m a value too high to mean anything | ||
| 2018 | 115× | 55.8× | 166× |
| 2017 | 164× | 137× | 164× |
| 2016 | 137× | 135× | 139× |
| 2015 | 82.8× | 9.4× | 199× |
| 2014 | 10.3× | 8.1× | 10.3× |
| 2013 | 8.2× | 5.8× | 8.9× |
| 2012 | 5.6× | 5.2× | 6.1× |
| 2011 | 5.4× | 4.2× | 5.4× |
| 2010 | 4.4× | 4.3× | 5.2× |
| 2009 | 4.9× | 4.9× | 5.4× |
Against its peers
Companies in Household & Personal Products nearest Kimberly-Clark's size, closest first, today.
| Company | Price to book ratio |
|---|---|
| KMBKimberly-Clark | 20.9× |
| KVUEKenvue | 3.6× |
| ELEstée Lauder Companies | 10.3× |
| CHDChurch & Dwight | 5.7× |
| CLColgate-Palmolive | n/m |
| AVYAvery Dennison | 5.9× |
| ELFe.l.f. Beauty | 5.8× |
| REYNReynolds Consumer Products | 2.1× |
| IPARInterparfums | 4.2× |
| Peer median | 5.7× |
What the price to book ratio tells you
Market value divided by the accounting value of the company's net assets. Below 1 means the market values the business at less than what it owns on paper.
Book value misses brands, software and people, so asset-light companies always look expensive on it. Most useful for banks and industrials.
More on Kimberly-Clark
Valuation data, not investment advice. Prices as of . Reported figures come from the company's filings with the SEC.